DID ANYONE GET THE NUMBER OF THE FDA BUS THAT JUST BACKED OVER ALL THOSE DOCTORS?
As of earlier today, Tuesday, December 6, 2022, the FDA successfully backed a bus over every doctor and hospital in America. U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown, in his 20 page ruling, stated in part:
“First, while § 396 limits the FDA’s powers as applied to medical devices, it does not do so in the context of drugs. As there is no statute limiting the FDA’s actions here, it cannot have acted outside of any statutory limitations,” he said. “Further, it cannot be said that the FDA had no colorable basis of authority. The FDA is charged by Congress with protecting public health and ensuring that regulated medical products are safe and effective, among other things.
Thanks for reading Protocol Widow's Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
“The plaintiffs do not dispute that the FDA has the authority, generally, to make public statements in-line with these purposes. Although the FDA could have, and perhaps should have, been more prudent in their communications, they had at least a colorable basis in authority—and there is no statute saying otherwise,” he added.
Reported here: Judge Rules on Lawsuit Against FDA Over Ivermectin (theepochtimes.com)
Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden and Dr. Robert Apter had sued the FDA in June 2022 arguing that the FDA had illegally interfered with their ability to prescribe for their patients in a manner that their training and experience led them to believe was best suited for positive health outcomes for their them.
Many doctors have found themselves without hospital privileges, without jobs & with medical boards threatening their licenses because they violated the protocols espoused by the FDA. The doctors above are not the only people fighting to regain not just their ability to practice but their reputations. This witch hunt has been actively targeting doctors across the country. Just put these names into your favorite search engine, Dr. Meryl Nass, Dr. Pierre Kory, P.A. Scott Miller and Dr. Peter McCullough. There are many more that have come under attack. While you are at it, don’t forget to look at their biographies. Context is everything to the fact checkers these days.
The FDA had made strong statements in their written “advice” that everyone in America read as a mandate against using the drug Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19. These doctors, as well as thousands of others, felt that the drug, in combination with other therapies, offered the best option for early and even some mid and late stage Covid-19 care.
Many have pointed out that the suggested care for an early Covid-19 diagnosis was to be sent home to quarantine until your symptoms are unmanageable or you turn blue, then report to the Emergency Room. This has never been considered as an option when dealing with any illness, much less in a deadly pandemic situation. The “lucky” patients were sent home with a pediatric dose of Dexamethasone as well as a low dose of an antibiotic like Azithromycin. At every turn any request for Ivermectin (or Hydroxychloroquine) were met with distain. Every doctor, in clinics or hospitals, stated that they could not prescribe either drug due to FDA mandates. As the variants continued to roll across the country, Ivermectin became the drug of choice after Delta reared it’s ugly head. However, for those brave doctors that did prescribe it, no national pharmacy chain would fill the prescription. Smaller hometown pharmacies, compounding pharmacies and overseas pharmacies would fill them. But if the package was intercepted by Customs it would be confiscated, with the intended receiver getting a notice that due to FDA guidance the product could not be used in the United States, due to concerns about consistency and purity.
Patients in hospitals generally didn’t know, due to quarantine rules, that their loved ones were arguing with doctors, either on the phone or masked face to masked face, “if my loved one is dying anyway, why can’t I sign a waiver of liability and choose the medications that I want him/her to have”? Basically, The Right to Try law went down the proverbial toilet. I can point to almost 500 families who will tell you they begged for Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Budesonide, antihistamines and an endless litany of supplements and medications only to be dismissed as akin to flat earthers. To watch their video testimonies, you can visit the Covid-19 Humanity Betrayal Memory Project at www.chbmp.org.
It has been estimated that as many as 800,000 Americans could have been saved with early appropriate treatment. If that figure is correct, compare that to American casualties during the Civil War, between 620,000 to 850,000 dead (per History.com), World War One, 116,708 (per U.S. Dept. of Defense via Google), World War Two, 298,000 (per Britannica.com) and the Vietnam War is just over 58,000 (per History.com). America has been fighting a war, as evidenced by the casualties, where the citizens were limited as to what weapons they could use.
So, who was responsible for limiting the “weapons” that could be used? According to the FDA, it wasn’t them. According to the doctors, it was the FDA. But hidden in the comments during the arguments for dismissal is this little gem. Read this very carefully, it is from the arguments made before Judge Jeffrey Brown on November 1, 2022 in Federal Court in Texas when the FDA petitioned for dismissal.
FDA attorney, Isaac Belfer stated:
“Plaintiffs have also not shown that any of their claimed injuries are fairly traceable to defendants’ statements because their injuries were caused by independent third-party conduct that was not a predictable response to those statements,” Belfer said.
He noted that the FDA’s pages say people can use ivermectin if their health care provider prescribes it; argued that the statements “did not bind the public or FDA, did not interpret any substantive rules, and did not set agency policy”; and said the FDA’s position could change in the future if new data become available.
“They also do not have legal consequences for anyone but simply provide nonbinding recommendations to consumers,” he said.
The first part of the statement that is quoted from Isaac Belfer indicates that there is an “independent third-party” whose conduct was not predictable. Really? It is my opinion that he is referring to hospitals. Not predictable? You mean if you dangle hundreds of thousands of dollars in front of companies that are always operating in the red to use protocols recommended to them but negated by other options they won’t lean towards the money?
If the FDA’s argument is to hold water, why, if they were only “recommending” against Ivermectin, did they NOT put out any statements over the last 32 months clarifying that physicians had the right to use ANY medications that they deemed safe and effective for their patients, including Ivermectin? That should have happened in the first 2 months.
Why, over the last 32 months, including CURRENTLY, are physicians still having to fight to use any other option other than “FDA approved” for their patients? If they care that is, but that’s another article in itself.
If Ivermectin is “dangerous”, “counterproductive”, “has potentially deadly side effects”, why did so many family members find their loved ones improving so fast if they were able to get them the drug? Even if they slipped it into lotions and rubbed the patients with it or put it in smoothies. Not only did they see improvements, but those that were discovered were then banned from visiting their loved ones.
Why, if the FDA was only offering “conversational” recommendations, when patient advocates forced hospitals to court to get their choice of treatments, usually including Ivermectin, were their cases dismissed or they were ruled against?
My takeaway is that if you are a doctor and you rejected a patient’s request for Ivermectin and that patient suffered injury or death you now have the target on your back. Why? Because FDA attorney Isaac Belfer was pretty clearly putting the responsibility on the hospitals or some other “third party”. If it is the hospital, they are lawyering up as you read this article, you are going to be left twisting in the wind. You might want to consider throwing yourself on the mercy of someone who can help you because you just participated in the purposeful elimination of close to a million Americans. You can’t hide behind “I was just doing my job”, it didn’t work at Nuremberg, what makes you think it will work now?
There is an amnesty program waiting for whistleblowers. Consider taking advantage of it because you know the hospital doesn’t care about you, they just wanted to balance their books. It’s all about the Benjamin’s, Baby.
Visit www.formerfeds.org for your options for amnesty.
Thanks for reading Protocol Widow's Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.